Facebook

Her…

Robin Hood og Sheriffen af Nottingham

Lene Espersen skriver på sin blog om SF:

C'est ci ne pas de Robin Hood

C'est ci ne pas un Villy Søvndal

… Det understreger vist tydeligt, at Robin Hood – denne ædle bekæmper af de onde skatteopkrævere – bestemt ikke ville føle sig hjemme i SF. Men det ville en anden karakter fra den klassiske fortælling. Nemlig sheriffen fra Nottingham. Det er ham, der uafladeligt udpiner befolkningen og hæver skatterne, indtil de sidste skillinger er rystet ud af støvlerne på de arme borgere. Det er ham, som Villy Søvndal og hans partifæller ønsker at kopiere med deres politik, der altid levner plads til endnu et vrid på skatteskruen.

Villy Søvndal er langt fra at være en nutidig Robin Hood. Men han er betænkeligt tæt på at ligne den onde sherif fra Nottingham.

Tag fra de rige, og giv til de fattige. Men så bliver de rige jo fattige? Villy’s parti går ind for, at man skal sætte næring efter næring, med en omskrivning af det gamle ordsprog. Man behøver ikke at være professor i statsfinanser for at se, at SF’s økonomiske politik mildest talt er uigennemtænkt.

Farligt at lukke islamtroende ind i hær eller Hjemmeværn

– integration eller ej – de er ikke til at stole på! (mine fremhævelser) EB:

‘Allahu Akbar’ – ‘Gud er stor’.

Sådan lød major Nidal Malik Hasans sidste ord, inden han i går åbnede ild mod andre soldater på militærbasen Fort Hood i Texas, fortæller generalløjtnant Robert Cone.

– Der er flere øjenvidner, som fortæller, at han skreg ‘Allahu Akbar’, inden han begyndte at skyde, siger generalløjtnanten til NBC News.

Major Nidal Malik Hasan affyrede to automatiske håndvåben og dræbte 13 personer, mens mindst 30 andre blev såret af skud.

Mens myndighederne forsøger at klarlægge motivet til blodbadet, står det imidlertid klart, at Nidal Malik Hasan var muslim med en noget ekstrem fortolkning af koranen.

Det fortæller kolleger til den 39-årige major og militærpsykiater, som selv overlevede massakren med fire skud i kroppen og nu befinder sig i myndighedernes varetægt.

Fra Fort Hood’s website:

FORT HOOD, Texas — At approximately 1:30 p.m., Nov. 5, a Soldier, Maj. Hasan Nidal Malik, allegedly fired shots into the Soldiers Readiness Processing Center on Fort Hood, resulting in 13 dead and numerous injured. As of this morning, 27 remained hospitalized.

In an early morning press conference, Lt. Gen. Bob Cone, III Corps and Fort Hood commander, confirmed that the major was injured but still alive and in stable condition. He is in custody.

Lt. Gen. Cone said the female officer first responder who shot Hasan was injured at the scene but is in stable condition at an area hospital.

The incident took place near a theater where 138 college graduates were receiving their diplomas. The Soldiers in the theater where able to gain control of the scene and no one in the theater was hurt.

Cone said his number one priority was to care for the wounded. Army and Federal Bureau of Investigation officials are investigating the incident.

The victims were largely military. No children were involved. The commander expressed his heartfelt condolences the families and friends of the victims.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Secretary of the Army John McHugh and Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey Jr. will hold a press conference on Fort Hood at 1:30 p.m. today (Friday, Nov. 6). The press event will be proceeded by an Army-wide moment of silence in honor of the Fort Hood victims, family members and loved ones.

OPDATERING – Tak til Snaphanen

The gunman who killed 12 people today at Ft. Hood appears, based on current media reports, to be Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan who was listed as a participant in a Homeland Security Policy Institute’s presidential transition task force last year. The task force was not officially affiliated with the White House. It was a project of the Homeland Security Policy Institute, an independent thinktank housed at George Washington University, aimed at drafting policy recommendations for the incoming Obama administration.

According to the task force’s May 2009 report [pdf], a “Nidal Hasan” from the Uniformed Services University School of Medicine was a task force event participant. Other participants included Senate and House staffers, Department of Homeland Security officials, Defense Department officials, and reporters for Politico, the Washington Post, and the London Times. Fort Hood shooter was member of Homeland Security Panel advising Obama

Mere Goldstone

Tonight’s debate: Did Goldstone admit UN colleague Chinkin was biased?

By Hillel Neuer

In tonight’s Brandeis University debate with former Israeli ambassador Dore Gold, Judge Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report on Gaza that bears his name, conceded that, had his UN inquiry been considered “judicial,” the prior statement of his colleague Christine Chinkin concerning Israel would have been sufficiently problematic as to disqualify her.

Recall that in a joint statement published on January 11, 2009 in the Letters section of London’s Sunday Times, entitled “Israel’s Bombardment of Gaza is Not Self-Defense — It’s a War Crime,” Chinkin declared that Israel was guilty of committing acts during Operation Cast Lead that were “contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law,” and of committing “prima facie war crimes.”

Goldstone’s concession on this point echoes what he told South Africa’s Business Day in an August 2nd interview: “If it had been a judicial inquiry, that letter she’d signed would have been a ground for disqualification.”

However, in the same breath as he effectively admitted the obvious—that her impartiality was irreparably compromised—Goldstone contradicted himself by defending Chinkin’s letter as being entirely irrelevant.

First, argued Goldstone, her letter was signed also by a number of eminent international law scholars.

Second, as he argued to Congress in his failed attempt to block this week’s House denunciation of the Goldstone Report, he said that Chinkin’s letter only dealt with the “technical” issue of whether Israel enjoyed the right to self-defense under international law, and not with the specific issues bearing on the inquiry.

Third, argued Goldstone tonight, Chinkin also condemned Hamas.

All of these arguments he has made before, several of which are documented in our legal brief. (See more at www.unwatch.org/goldstone.) Yet each is specious, misleading and without any basis in law. I believe that the jurist Goldstone knows this full well, but apparently believes that the ends (his desire to save Israel from itself) justify the means (accepting a biased colleague on his inquiry panel, just as he accepted to work under the UN Human Rights Council’s biased S/9-1 mandate that was never changed as a matter of law).

Læs resten

P-vagter mod terror

Nej, det er ikke en forening som “Bedstemødre mod Asyl”, eller hvad de nu kalder sig. Det er – tadaaa –  Københavns Kommune. Suk…

»Vi har utroligt mange øjne og ører i gadebilledet, som det er naturligt at udnytte til at spotte mistænkelig opførsel,« forklarer Anders Møller, direktør i Parkering København.

Så nu skal P-vagterne til at agere politi-informatører? eller politi-amatører? Alle borgere – ikke kun P-vagter – er da mere end velkomne til at ringe og sige, at hendes arabiske nabo er begyndt at samle rør og blande kemikalier, så det stinker i hele villa-kvarteret?

Villy’s gode intentioner op til kommunalvalget

– vi ved jo godt, hvor vejen går hen, hvis den er brolagt med den slags. Den Kære Leder af Socialistisk Folkeparti ymter sligt i dagens avis:

Ud med mørkemændene!

Ud med mørkemændene!

Områder, hvor ballademagere og kriminelle sætter dagsordenen, og hvor befolkningen er for skræmt til at kontakte politi og myndigheder.

Mens mange ressourcestærke beboere i Tingbjerg for længst er rykket ud, er problemerne bare vokset og vokset. Der er behov for en både akut og omfattende indsats.

Den hårde kerne af kriminelle skal mærke konsekvens med det samme. De skal i fængsel eller væk fra Tingbjerg. Når området er under kontrol, kan socialarbejderne rykke ind. Det lader sig ikke gøre uden en konsekvent og hård tilgang over for de få ballademagere, som terroriserer en hel bydel.

Derfor har SF lavet en særlig Tingbjerg-model. En plan, som effektivt vil lægge en dæmper på utrygheden og urolighederne i bydelen.

Læs endelig det hele – især læsernes svar er underholdende. Folk er ikke så stupide, som Fili Safendal tror. Her et par godbidder:

S. M., 3630 | Skrevet: 5. nov 09 kl. 21:11
Villy Søvndal er absolut ikke andet end varm luft

J. W., 2400 NV | Skrevet: 5. nov 09 kl. 16:41
Hurra, Villy Søvndal – du og venstrefløjen fornægter altså arv og gæld og alle tidligere holdninger? Undskyld mig, men jeg tror ikke en skid på din valg-pop – før jeg ser noget praktisk politisk handling fra dig.

P. K., Helsingør | Skrevet: 5. nov 09 kl. 14:38
SF vil ikke acceptere osv… Allerede i 1.linie flere gravende fejl.Der skulle have stået: SF vil nu efter 25 år ikke acceptere….Der skulle have stået: Undskyld, undskyld og atter undskyld for SF svigtende,med vilje.

L. H., Kolding | Skrevet: 5. nov 09 kl. 12:36
“Hør da lige, hvor jeg gunger…” VS, du er en vendekåbe af værste slags, som er villig til at sælge din sjæl (og vores med). Men det værste er næsten at der findes mennesker som hopper med på den limpind. Man skal huske at bag det sledske smil gemmer der sig en socialist-mullah. Skam over dig.

etc. etc. 😀